-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
fix: add a missing dependency to language package #430
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. WalkthroughMoves and reorganizes a few workspace package dependencies: shifts Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
Claude finished @ymc9's task —— View job PR Review: Add Missing Dependency to Language PackageReview Checklist:
Review Findings✅ Correctly Identified Issue ✅ Proper Solution Issues Found
Expected FixThe correct fix should:
Security & Performance Assessment
Recommendation❌ Changes Required: The fix needs to be applied to the correct package. The language package should have |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
This PR attempts to fix a missing dependency issue by adding @zenstackhq/common-helpers as a dependency. However, the dependency is being added to the root package.json instead of to the packages/language/package.json file where it's actually needed.
Key Changes:
- Added
@zenstackhq/common-helpersas a workspace dependency in the rootpackage.json - Updated
pnpm-lock.yamlto reflect the new dependency and its transitive dependencies
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 1 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| package.json | Adds @zenstackhq/common-helpers to root dependencies, but should be added to packages/language/package.json instead |
| pnpm-lock.yaml | Updates lockfile with new dependency resolution and snapshots for eslint-related packages |
Files not reviewed (1)
- pnpm-lock.yaml: Language not supported
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
package.json(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
- GitHub Check: Upload results
- GitHub Check: claude-review
- GitHub Check: build-test (20.x, sqlite)
- GitHub Check: build-test (20.x, postgresql)
|
Claude finished @ymc9's task —— View job PR Review: Missing Dependency Fix
|
|
Claude finished @ymc9's task —— View job PR Review: Missing Dependency Fix ✅Review Checklist:
🔍 Review SummaryThis PR correctly fixes a missing dependency issue in the ✅ What's Good
📋 Technical AnalysisFile Changes:
Security Assessment: ✅ No Concerns
Performance Impact: ✅ Minimal
Architecture Alignment: ✅ Excellent
🎯 Recommendation✅ APPROVE - This PR successfully resolves the missing dependency issue with proper monorepo practices. The changes are minimal, targeted, and follow best practices for pnpm workspace dependency management. 📝 Minor Notes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
packages/cli/package.json(2 hunks)packages/language/package.json(1 hunks)pnpm-workspace.yaml(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
- GitHub Check: build-test (20.x, sqlite)
- GitHub Check: build-test (20.x, postgresql)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/cli/package.json (1)
35-35: Clarify Prisma placement in both dependencies and devDependencies.Prisma is now listed in both
dependencies(line 35) anddevDependencies(line 57). Typically, a package should be in one or the other depending on whether it's needed at runtime or only during development. Confirm that dual placement is intentional and necessary for the CLI package.Also applies to: 57-57
pnpm-workspace.yaml (1)
8-8: No action required — Prisma v6.19.0 upgrade is safe.This codebase uses ZenStack, which abstracts Prisma for migrations only. The breaking changes introduced between v6.10.0 and v6.19.0 (prisma.config.ts, runtime alias removal, generator config changes) do not apply here since there are no Prisma schema files, generator configurations, or runtime settings. The migration improvements and tooling enhancements are additions rather than breaking changes. ZenStack's CLI commands (
prisma migrate dev,prisma migrate deploy, etc.) will continue to work as expected.
|
Claude finished @ymc9's task —— View job PR Review: Missing Dependency Fix ✅Review Checklist:
🔍 Review SummaryThis PR correctly fixes a missing dependency issue in the ✅ What's Good
📋 Technical AnalysisFile Changes:
Security Assessment: ✅ No Concerns
Performance Impact: ✅ Minimal
Architecture Alignment: ✅ Excellent
🎯 Recommendation✅ APPROVE - This PR successfully resolves the missing dependency issue with proper monorepo practices. The changes are minimal, targeted, and follow best practices for pnpm workspace dependency management. 📝 Minor Notes
|

Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.