Skip to content

Conversation

@ymc9
Copy link
Member

@ymc9 ymc9 commented Nov 18, 2025

No description provided.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 18, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Updates Prisma client version from 6.17.x to 6.19.x in the CLI plugins test setup, affecting both runtime and development dependency specifications in the test configuration.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Prisma Client Version Bump
tests/integration/tests/cli/plugins.test.ts
Updated prisma and @prisma/client versions from 6.17.x to 6.19.x in both runtime and development dependencies

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning No description was provided by the author, making it impossible to evaluate whether it relates to the changeset. Add a pull request description explaining the purpose of updating Prisma to 6.19, any breaking changes, and testing performed.
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and accurately describes the main change: updating Prisma from version 6.17.x to 6.19.x, which aligns with the file modification summary.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch chore/prisma-6.19

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d6389fa and d29ef1b.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (12)
  • package.json is excluded by !**/*.json
  • packages/plugins/trpc/tests/projects/nuxt-trpc-v10/package.json is excluded by !**/*.json
  • packages/plugins/trpc/tests/projects/nuxt-trpc-v11/package.json is excluded by !**/*.json
  • packages/plugins/trpc/tests/projects/t3-trpc-v11/package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json, !**/*.json
  • packages/plugins/trpc/tests/projects/t3-trpc-v11/package.json is excluded by !**/*.json
  • packages/runtime/package.json is excluded by !**/*.json
  • packages/schema/package.json is excluded by !**/*.json
  • packages/sdk/package.json is excluded by !**/*.json
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml, !**/*.yaml
  • tests/integration/test-run/package.json is excluded by !**/*.json
  • tests/integration/tests/frameworks/nextjs/test-project/package.json is excluded by !**/*.json
  • tests/integration/tests/frameworks/trpc/test-project/package.json is excluded by !**/*.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/integration/tests/cli/plugins.test.ts (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
  • GitHub Check: build-test (20.x)
  • GitHub Check: dependency-review
  • GitHub Check: build-test (20.x)
  • GitHub Check: build-test (20.x)

@ymc9 ymc9 merged commit e2e2024 into dev Nov 19, 2025
8 checks passed
@ymc9 ymc9 deleted the chore/prisma-6.19 branch November 19, 2025 00:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants