Skip to content

Conversation

@icemac
Copy link
Member

@icemac icemac commented Nov 18, 2016

There is no need to run the code quality checks along with the unit tests for each environment.

Michael Howitz added 3 commits November 18, 2016 15:50
There is no need to run its checks on each environment.
It is not yet activated because there are way to many flake8 failures in this
package.
@icemac icemac force-pushed the separate-code-quality-checks branch from bcd7771 to 75c375d Compare November 18, 2016 14:53
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Nov 18, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 71.104% when pulling 80193ba on separate-code-quality-checks into cdb2871 on Python3_update.

Copy link
Member

@sallner sallner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Accept from the two little details, for which it would be good to have a reason, it looks good to me.

.travis.yml Outdated
- pip install tox coveralls coverage
script:
- tox -e py
- tox -e py,isort
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here we might also want a run of the flake8 testenv, or is there any specific reason not to do so?

Copy link
Member Author

@icemac icemac Dec 2, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The reason is that this package contains tons of flake8 violations which I did not yet wanted to fix for this PR.

@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
[tox]
envlist = coverage-clean,py{27,34,35,36,py},coverage-report
envlist = coverage-clean,py{27,34,35,36,py},coverage-report,isort
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Flake8 is also not called as a standard testenv here

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

dito

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 2, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+2.8%) to 73.917% when pulling 6241048 on separate-code-quality-checks into cdb2871 on Python3_update.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 2, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 73.917% when pulling 7dba238 on separate-code-quality-checks into a88fd0c on Python3_update.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 2, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-33.7%) to 40.253% when pulling a3fd929 on separate-code-quality-checks into a88fd0c on Python3_update.

@icemac icemac merged commit b4da29b into Python3_update Dec 3, 2016
@icemac icemac deleted the separate-code-quality-checks branch December 3, 2016 08:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants