Conversation
status_code as u16StatusCode
StatusCodeStatusCode
kreedzZhao
pushed a commit
to kreedzZhao/rnet
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request includes changes to the
Responseclass in thernet.pyifile and theResponseimplementation in thesrc/resp.rsfile. The main focus of these changes is to update the type of thestatus_codeattribute and simplify its getter method.Type update:
rnet.pyi: Changed the type ofstatus_codefromtyping.Anytobuiltins.int.Getter method simplification:
src/resp.rs: Simplified thestatus_codegetter method by returning the status code directly as au16instead of creating a Python object.