fix(store): improve inner locking#2074
Merged
Merged
Conversation
sergerad
approved these changes
May 13, 2026
Mirko-von-Leipzig
approved these changes
May 14, 2026
Collaborator
Mirko-von-Leipzig
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks! I think this further highlights that we really want a snapshot based system where these locks are impossible to misuse on accident.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There were two potential issues with the
innerRwLock:get_current_blockchain_data()was holding a read lock while doing an SQLite querysync_notes()was re-acquiring the read lock while iterating over the blocks returned by the SQLite queryBoth of these are trivial to fix.
The
sync_notes()change has a measurable impact on thesync-notesbenchmark of the stress test tool.Before:
After: