Skip to content

refactoring-mutex#8

Merged
Nityam573 merged 8 commits intomainfrom
refactor/memory-store-mutex
Mar 24, 2026
Merged

refactoring-mutex#8
Nityam573 merged 8 commits intomainfrom
refactor/memory-store-mutex

Conversation

@Nityam573
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

refactored mutex for anti-replay checking

@Nityam573 Nityam573 requested a review from ilya-korotya March 19, 2026 15:21
Comment thread Integration-for-verifiers (Billions Wallet)/js/config/verification-configs.js Outdated
Comment thread Integration-for-verifiers (Billions Wallet)/js/index.js Outdated
@ilya-korotya
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I see that scripts uses our old circuits credentialAtomicQueryV3-beta.1 at the moment we support new one credentialAtomicQueryV3, credentialAtomicQueryV3-16-16-64

@Nityam573 Nityam573 self-assigned this Mar 23, 2026
Comment thread Integration-for-verifiers (Billions Wallet)/js/config/verification-configs.js Outdated
@ilya-korotya
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ilya-korotya commented Mar 23, 2026

Our libs support embedded verification keys / circuits. When you create a new verifier, please use the next code:

const verifier = await auth.Verifier.newVerifier({
    stateResolver: resolvers,
    ipfsGatewayURL: "https://ipfs.io",
  });

End remove keys folder from both examples, please.

Comment thread Integration-for-verifiers (Billions Wallet)/js/config/verification-configs.js Outdated
Comment thread Integration-for-verifiers (Billions Wallet)/js/config/verification-configs.js Outdated
Comment thread Integration-for-verifiers (Billions Wallet)/js/index.js Outdated
Comment thread Integration-for-verifiers (Billions Wallet)/js/index.js Outdated
Comment thread Integration-for-verifiers (Billions Wallet)/js/config/verification-configs.js Outdated
@0xpulkit 0xpulkit self-requested a review March 24, 2026 10:13
@0xpulkit
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

LGTM

@Nityam573 Nityam573 merged commit 15551c8 into main Mar 24, 2026
1 check passed
@ilya-korotya ilya-korotya self-requested a review March 24, 2026 10:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants