A hook to access sharp instance for extra processing (crop, maintain EXIF, etc)

[zachleat]

See https://twitter.com/ericvalois/status/1352203081304436738

[tusamni]

I'd love to be able to have a hook to access EXIF data.

[colingreen]

I'd like to see this too – I want to get hold of the image's dominant colour from the Sharp stats: https://sharp.pixelplumbing.com/api-input#stats

[zachleat]

This repository is now using lodash style issue management for enhancements. This means enhancement issues will now be closed instead of leaving them open.

View the enhancement backlog here. Don’t forget to upvote the top comment with 👍!

[ScreenDream]

I already commented on the other issue report, but want to repeat the request here:

Yes, keeping image metadata like EXIF, XMP, and IPTC and also the ICC colour profile are critical for me as well.
I'm a visual artist building my website with eleventy ATM and will be unable to use the image plugin at all if I can't keep metadata and ICC profiles - my images look washed out and the contact information on the images is missing after the processing.

I would be super thankful if somebody could implement the hooks to activate/access the "withMetadata" functionality that is already in sharp: https://sharp.pixelplumbing.com/api-output#withmetadata
I am sadly not up to that myself.

Thanks a ton!

Tom

[philiprenich]

Would it be bad to do something as naïve as adding a sharpHook option that takes a Sharp instance as a parameter and returns a Sharp instance. Then in img.js (maybe around line 500?) have

        if(typeof this.options.sharpHook === "function") {
          sharpInstance = this.options.sharpHook(sharpInstance);
        }

It's not foolproof by any means. It would allow the dev to completely override what 11ty-img is doing: one could sharp.resize(100, null) and it would ignore any resizing you've asked the plugin to do while not reporting correctly. Perhaps running the hook before everything else would be better. Still, I feel like there's some more user friendly way of doing this since this is pretty heavy-handed and permissive.

---

EDIT

Putting that code a bit higher does feel better. After the sharp instance clone on line 481, but before the current resize/rotate code means that any resizing the user does in the hook is overwritten by the plugin options. While that means ignoring explicit calls to resize in the hook, it feels less confusing to respect the primary options of the plugin.

[ScreenDream]

I can't comment on the "would it be bad" part ;-)
But otherwise I think this could be interesting if nobody has a better and more "non-bad" solution while leaving the plugin intact otherwise.
Like a kind of "Pro-mode".

My current workaround is setting the default for "withMetadata" to "true" in the sharp/lib/constructor.js (line 261).
Dirty hack, but does what I need for the time being.
My website is almost ready now thanks to this.

But yeah, like I wrote on the other thread, IMO this is mission critical for any application of eleventy where the image IS the product.

Thanks to everybody looking into this!

[philiprenich]

@ScreenDream Feel free to use my fork - though I won't guarantee this will always be around, though for the moment I'll be using it until there's a solution in the main repo here (bit easier than re-writing my code to use Sharp directly).

Sounds like you're doing everything at build time though and don't need access to a proper package so your solution may be stable enough.

Here's how you'd use a GitHub url in your package.json

[hansspiess]

First of all, thanks for this great plugin - it is a really valuable tool when working with image content!

As this PR is closed: is the Feature (a hook exposing sharpInstance) being rejected? I think it would be a handy addition to the plugin, keeping it's API concise while opening possibilities for users.

Edit: ok now i get it, closed PR != rejected feature. However as i have to work with a fork of @11ty/eleventy-img: i'm looking forward for this to make it into main.

[smth]

I was just wondering about this. I wrote up an experiment here where I used Sharp to essentially get the background colour of an image. I called Sharp directly to do this, which feels like a doubling of work (assuming the data I generated already exists somewhere).