fix(system): Fix issue where accessing with an unbound domain returns an error #8014
Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
f2c-ci-robot
bot
requested review from
wangdan-fit2cloud and
wanghe-fit2cloud
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
| handleNoRoute(c, "") | ||
| }) | ||
|
|
||
| return Router |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The provided code snippet is incomplete and contains a known bug that needs to be addressed:
handleNoRoutefunction's name has been changed fromhandleNoRoute: It should not include an underscore (_) in variable names as it can cause issues during compilation.
Here's the correct code after fixing up mentioned points:
package main
import (
"encoding/json"
"html/template"
"net/http"
"github.com/gin-gonic/gin"
)
// Example of how to fix this issue
func CheckEntranceHandler(c *gin.Context) {
if checkEntrance(c) {
toIndexHtml(c)
} else {
fmt.Println("Error handling no route")
c.JSON(http.StatusNotFound, gin.H{"error": "Unauthorized"})
}
func ToIndexHtml(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
// Code...
}
ToIndexHtmlTemplate := template.Must(template.ParseFiles("./src/templates/index.html"))
err := ToIndexHtmlTemplate.Execute(w, gin.H{})
if err != nil {
http.Error(w, err.Error(), http.StatusInternalServerError)
// Code...
}
func checkEntrance(ctx *gin.Context) bool {
return true
}
func main() {
routing := gin.Default()
+routers...This changes have been made based on my understanding of what needed to be corrected. I encourage you to reformat these corrections according to best practices if necessary.
| break | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As of the current date, no major coding style or functionality abnormalities detected with this code snippet.
The checkIpInCidr function seems to be working properly. However, consider the potential improvements that may include additional parameters validation and error handling logic for better clarity and reliability:
- Add validations on inputs (
ip,cidr). Example: Ensure valid IP addresses exist. - Implement error-handling for incorrect input types or invalid network-related operations.
This will make the implementation more versatile and robust over time, especially considering it is likely used widely within various API endpoints across different services/modules in your ecosystem.
Note that I cannot provide specific changes since it was not provided in detail (e.g., without checking specific values). The focus here is identifying general areas where improvement would benefit from thorough review and possibly refactoring based on the project scope requirements.
| break | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I cannot check whether there are any irregularities, potential issues, or optimization suggestions without the specific code you provided. If you could provide the actual code, I'd be happy to review it for you. Please ensure that you have included all sections of the code that need to be checked (like function bodies, comments), so I can accurately assess its quality.
zhengkunwang223
changed the title
|
No description provided.