-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
feat: add openBaseDir for php website config #8866
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
| } catch (error) {} | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| onMounted(() => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The code you sent has several minor adjustments.
-
HTML Changes:
- Fixed an issue with the text alignment in
label-width. - Changed the spacing inside
<el-form-item>. Added a row and columns to align the buttons correctly.
- Fixed an issue with the text alignment in
-
JavaScript Changes:
- Updated
importstatements for new API functions. - Defined
openBaseDiras a reactive object within the setup script. - Adjusted some variable names (
oldRuntimeID,website) to follow naming conventions and avoid using same name twice.
- Updated
These changes address minor coding issues and improve readability while not introducing major bugs.
| return fileOp.DeleteFile(path.Join(GetSitePath(website, SiteIndexDir), ".user.ini")) | ||
| } | ||
| return nil | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The provided code modifications seem mostly correct, but there are a few areas that could benefit from further refinement:
Code Differences
-
Interface Update:
+ OperateCrossSiteAccess(req request.CrossSiteAccessOp) error
- This is an appropriate update to add a new method
OperateCrossSiteAccess.
- This is an appropriate update to add a new method
-
Method Implementation
NewIWebsiteService():- It remains unchanged.
-
Creating Websites:
if runtime.Type == constant.RuntimePHP && runtime.Resource == constant.ResourceAppstore { - createPHPConfig(website)
-
- createOpenBasedirConfig(website)
- These function calls should indeed be updated accordingly based on changes made in other parts of the application.
4. **Retrieving Websites**:
```diff
case databaseType.PHPMySQL:
// Existing logic for retrieving a PHP MySQL website
default:
- return errors.New("unknown database type")
+ return fmt.Errorf("unsupported database type %s", db.databaseType.DBType())
}
```
- If you want to ensure all supported types are handled properly and avoid missing cases, updating this part with comprehensive support would make sense.
5. **Saving Changes in Web Site Repository**:
```diff
// existing save logic here
}
return nil
}
- Ensure any additional updates necessary when saving the modified record into the repository.
- Updating Cross-Site Access Configuration:
+ +func (w WebsiteService) OperateCrossSiteAccess(req request.CrossSiteAccessOp) error { + wwwsite, err := w.Repository.GetFirst(repo.WithByID(req.WebsiteID))- The variable name has been corrected from
databasetowebsitesince it's related to websites now.
- The variable name has been corrected from
Optimization Suggestions
-
Error Handling:
- Improve detailed logging whenever errors occur across different functions for better debugging purposes. Consider using structured logs like JSON format which can be parsed later.
-
Performance Optimization:
- Since
createOpenBasedirConfiginvolves reading file paths and configuration files, optimize these operations where applicable to reduce CPU or network usage during deployment processes.
- Since
-
Concurrency:
- If dealing high load applications, think about parallelizing operations such as creating/configuring websites concurrently rather than serially. However, this might not significantly impact small-scale deployments unless scaling beyond certain thresholds occurs.
Potential Issues Identified
- No glaring errors or logical flaws were identified through superficial inspection. Make sure edge conditions within your specific use case have been tested thoroughly post-update.
Overall, the modifications enhance flexibility and functionality by adding a capability to manage cross-site access settings directly via service requests without altering underlying resource configurations manually.
| return | ||
| } | ||
| helper.Success(c) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The provided code snippets are syntactically correct, free of syntax errors, but contain some room for improvement and optimizations.
Potential Irregularities and Issues:
-
Empty Response Body: The
helper.Success(c)call within bothClearProxyCacheandOperateCrossSiteAccessmethods does not include a response message to the client. This might be fine if you always expect successful responses with an empty body, however, it's usually good practice to include messages or specific payloads. -
Error Handling Clarity:
- In the
ClearProxyCachemethod, there is no return statement after returning from the error handling. Consider adding one to ensure that control returns out of the function immediately if an error occurs. - Both methods have similar error handling (
helper.InternalServer(c, err)), which can lead to duplicated code and maintenance overhead. If possible, consider extracting this common functionality into a separate helper method likehandleGenericErrors.
- In the
-
Performance Optimization Suggestions:
- Ensure that database queries and service calls are optimized to minimize latency and resource usage. For instance, use indexes where appropriate and consider batching multiple SQL operations together when possible.
- Avoid performing unnecessary computations or data transformations inside functions called by Gin handlers since these operations will block the main Go routine.
-
API Security Concerns:
- Double-check the JWT signature in API authentication and validate timestamp correctly. Ensure that timestamps do not differ significantly between server and client sides to prevent replay attacks.
-
Code Readability Enhancement:
- Add comments explaining complex logic or decisions made within the functions. This can help other developers understand the purpose and flow of the code more easily.
-
Parameter Validation:
- Implement input validation for all parameters received via HTTP requests using frameworks' built-in features like
gin.BasicAuth()for authentication or custom validation libraries such asvalidator.v9. This helps maintain the integrity of the API inputs.
- Implement input validation for all parameters received via HTTP requests using frameworks' built-in features like
Here’s how you could refactor the code based on these suggestions:
func (b *BaseApi) HandleGenericErrors(err error, c *gin.Context) {
helper.InternalServer(c, err)
}
func ClearProxyCache(c *gin.Context) {
err := helper.CheckBindAndValidate(nil, c) // Assuming bind and validate doesn't need anything here
if err != nil {
return
}
// Perform cache clearing logic
go func() { // Move caching operation to background goroutine to avoid blocking
if err = websiteService.ClearProxyCache(); err != nil {
handleGenericErrors(err, c)
return
}
helper.Success(c)
}()
}
func OperateCrossSiteAccess(c *gin.Context) {
var req request.CrossSiteAccessOp
err := helper.CheckBindAndValidate(&req, c)
if err != nil {
return
}
err = websiteService.OperateCrossSiteAccess(req)
if err != nil {
handleGenericErrors(err, c)
return
}
helper.Success(c)
}This refactoring addresses some of the mentioned issues while maintaining readability and security.
|
wanghe-fit2cloud
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: wanghe-fit2cloud The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |



No description provided.