Skip to content

Conversation

@shaohuzhang1
Copy link
Contributor

fix: Ollama maximum output token field

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Apr 24, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Apr 24, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

num_predict = forms.SliderField(
TooltipLabel(_('Output the maximum Tokens'),
_('Specify the maximum number of tokens that the model can generate')),
required=True, default_value=1024,
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code provided in the comment about optimizing OllamaLLMModelParams appears to be describing changes made to an existing form schema using some UI widget classes. Specifically:

  1. Parameter Changes:

    • An attribute named max_tokens (slider) was changed to a new parameter num_predict.
  2. Additional Fields:

    • No additional fields were added.
  3. General Considerations:
    The change from one field name (max_tokens) to another (num_predict) suggests that these might represent conceptually similar parameters but with slightly different meanings or purposes within the context of the application.

    • It's important to ensure that both parameters serve a consistent purpose throughout the entire system.
    • If num_predict is meant to replace max_tokens, there should likely be a note in comments explaining this replacement and confirming its equivalence meaningfully.

Here are some general steps to consider for further verification and improvement:

General Verification Steps:

  1. Contextual Understanding:
    Ensure you have a clear understanding of the roles that "output the maximum Tokens" and "generate the expected number of tokens" play in the larger project architecture.

  2. Consistency Check:
    Confirm that the use of num_predict accurately reflects its intended functionality, especially if other parts of the code also rely on it under a previous identifier.

  3. Documentation Update:
    Double-check if any documentation needs updating to reflect the renaming of the field from max_tokens to num_predict.

  4. Unit Tests:
    Write unit tests to validate behavior around the interaction between this slider and other related logic.

  5. Review by Collaborators:
    Share updates with team members to gather feedback and address concerns before deploying significant changes.

Optimizations and Suggestions:

  • Type Consistency:
    Maintain consistency in type definitions. While not strictly necessary for a simple SliderField, ensuring uniformity across types can prevent runtime errors.
# Example: Replacing 'max_tokens' with 'num_predict'
class OllamaLLMModelParams(BaseForm):
    # ...
    num_predict = forms.SliderField(  # Use pluralize the term as per semantic correctness
        TooltipLabel(_('Output the Maximum Number of Predictions/Tokens')),  # Clarify the role clearly
        _('Specify how many predictions/tokens the model will make'),  # Specify what the model actually does
        required=True, default_value=1024, min_value=0,
        step=1, max_value=4096  # Adjust values based on specific requirements/supported limits
    )

This approach ensures clarity, enhances maintainability, and prevents unintended side effects from subtle changes like renaming parameters.

@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 merged commit 33b1cd6 into main Apr 24, 2025
4 checks passed
@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 deleted the pr@main@fix_ollama_model_field branch April 24, 2025 08:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants