Skip to content

Conversation

@shaohuzhang1
Copy link
Contributor

fix: In the floating window embedding, the user in the conversation is displayed as a tourist #4019

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Sep 22, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Sep 22, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

if 'asker' in params and not is_asker:
query += f"&asker={params.get('asker')}"
return query

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided code has a few potential issues and can be optimized:

Potential Issues:

  1. Variable Scope: The is_asker variable is declared inside the if application.work_flow is not None: block but is used outside of it when checking 'asker', which might lead to unexpected behavior.

  2. Logic for API Input Variable: The logic to determine if each input field should include an API request ('api_input') relies solely on the value assigned at runtime, which could cause issues if values change dynamically after initialization.

  3. Redundant Code: There is redundant handling for "asker" in both the inner loop and the outer condition when determining whether to append it to the query parameters.

  4. String Formatting: Use Python's formatted string literals (f-strings) instead of concatenation with +, which improves readability and performance.

Optimization Suggestions:

  1. Initialize is_asker Outside Block: Initialize is_asker before entering the critical section where its usage depends on external conditions.

  2. Avoid Redundant Checks: Combine checks for 'asker' into one statement using logical OR (or). This eliminates redundancy in appending "asker" to the query string.

Here is the revised version of the method:

def get_query_api_input(self, application, params):
    query = ''
    # Initialize is_asker outside the critical section
    is_asker = False

    if application.work_flow is not None:
        work_flow = application.work_flow
        if work_flow is not None:
            input_field_list = [field for field in work_flow.input_fields 
                                if field.assignment_method == 'api_input']
            if input_field_list:
                for field in input_field_list:
                    if field.variable in params:
                        if field.variable == 'asker':
                            is_asker = True
                        
                        query += f"&{field.variable}={params[field.variable]}"
    
    # Append asker only if it wasn't already added due to dynamic value assignment
    if 'asker' in params and not is_asker:
       query += f"&asker={params.get('asker', '')}"

    return query

Explanation of Changes:

  1. Initialization: Added is_asker = False line above any conditional blocks where it will be used.

  2. Dynamic Value Handling: Combined the check for 'asker' into a single condition within the for loop to avoid redundant operations.

  3. F-string Usage: Replaced manual concatenation with f-string formatting for improved clarity and efficiency. Also ensured that non-existent key retrieval uses .get() with a default value of an empty string, preventing exceptions.

@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 merged commit d2c7167 into v1 Sep 22, 2025
3 of 5 checks passed
@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 deleted the pr@v1@fix_chat_asker branch September 22, 2025 08:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants