Skip to content

fix: Document tag search#4944

Merged
zhanweizhang7 merged 1 commit intov2from
pr@v2@fix_doc_tag_search
Mar 25, 2026
Merged

fix: Document tag search#4944
zhanweizhang7 merged 1 commit intov2from
pr@v2@fix_doc_tag_search

Conversation

@shaohuzhang1
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

fix: Document tag search

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Mar 25, 2026

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[str(k_id) for k_id in actual_knowledge_ids]
)
document_id_list = QuerySet(Document).filter(
id__in=document_id_list,
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided code looks mostly correct, but there are a few improvements and potential considerations:

  1. String Conversion: The line [str(k_id) for k_id in actual_knowledge_ids] is converting the integer IDs to strings before passing them to get_knowledge_list_of_authorized(). This can be simplified using type hinting with a list of integers instead of converting explicitly.

  2. Variable Naming Consistency: Ensure that all variable names are consistent in their case and style (e.g., camelCase).

  3. Type Hinting: Consider adding type hints for better readability and maintainability. However, since this snippet is part of an existing function, it may not always make sense to add comprehensive type hints unless you have access to additional context about the expected data types involved.

  4. Empty Check: Before filtering documents, consider adding checks like:

    if not document_id_list:
        # Handle empty document list appropriately
        return []
  5. Error Handling: Add error handling to manage cases where actual_knowledge_ids, document_id_list, or other necessary variables might be None or empty.

Here's an improved version with these points in mind:

import typing as t

def execute(
        self,
        knowledge_id_list: t.List[int],
        search_mode: str,
        search_scope_type: str,
):
    """
    Execute method with improved logic.

    :param knowledge_id_list: List of knowledge IDs.
    :param search_mode: Search mode string.
    :param search_scope_type: Scope type string.
    :return: A response from executing workflow.
    """

    # Get known approved knowledge based on user ID and filtered IDs
    authorized_knowledge_ids = get_knowledge_list_of_authorized(
        self.workflow_manage.get_body().get('chat_user_id'),
        knowledge_id_list,
    )

    # Filter documents that match the knowledge IDs
    document_id_list = Document.objects.filter(id__in=knowledge_id_list)

    # If no valid documents found, return an appropriate message
    if not document_id_list.exists():
        return "No valid documents found."

    # Further processing logic here...
    response = {
        "authorized_knowledge_ids": authorized_knowledge_ids,
        "filtered_documents": document_id_list.values(),
    }

    return response

These suggestions should help ensure the code is more robust, clear, and efficient while maintaining compatibility with existing data structures.

@zhanweizhang7 zhanweizhang7 merged commit d82fa99 into v2 Mar 25, 2026
3 checks passed
@zhanweizhang7 zhanweizhang7 deleted the pr@v2@fix_doc_tag_search branch March 25, 2026 06:12
@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Mar 25, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants