Skip to content

fix early cast when calculating cache size#301

Merged
haochengxia merged 2 commits into1a1a11a:developfrom
haochengxia:hxia/cast
Feb 2, 2026
Merged

fix early cast when calculating cache size#301
haochengxia merged 2 commits into1a1a11a:developfrom
haochengxia:hxia/cast

Conversation

@haochengxia
Copy link
Collaborator

Fix #300

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @haochengxia, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a critical bug where cache sub-component sizes were being miscalculated due to premature type casting, potentially leading to incorrect cache behavior. By adjusting the order of operations and adding robust validation, the changes ensure accurate cache sizing and prevent the system from operating with invalid or zero-sized cache partitions, thereby improving the overall stability and reliability of the cache simulation framework.

Highlights

  • Bug Fix: Early Type Casting: Corrected an 'early cast' bug in cache size calculations across various eviction policies (ClockPro, QDLP, S3FIFO, S3FIFOd, S3FIFOv0, SLRU, S3LRU, flashProb). Previously, an int64_t cast was applied before multiplication or division with floating-point ratios, which could lead to precision loss and incorrect cache size determinations. The fix ensures that the floating-point arithmetic is completed before the final cast to int64_t.
  • Cache Size Validation: Introduced validation checks in several cache initialization functions (QDLP, S3FIFO, S3FIFOd, S3FIFOv0, SLRU, S3LRU, flashProb) to ensure that calculated sub-cache sizes (e.g., FIFO, main, LRU, RAM, disk segments) are positive. If a calculated size is zero or negative, an ERROR message is now logged, preventing the creation of invalid cache configurations.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@haochengxia haochengxia changed the title [BUG]: Early cast when calculating cache size fix early cast when calculating cache size Feb 2, 2026
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly fixes a critical bug across multiple cache eviction algorithm implementations where an early cast from uint64_t to int64_t could lead to integer overflow when calculating cache partition sizes. The fix involves changing the order of operations to perform floating-point multiplication or integer division before casting to int64_t, which prevents the overflow. Additionally, the PR introduces valuable validation checks to ensure that calculated cache and segment sizes are positive, aborting with a descriptive error message on invalid configurations. These changes significantly improve the robustness and correctness of the cache size calculations.

@haochengxia haochengxia merged commit f1a56cd into 1a1a11a:develop Feb 2, 2026
4 checks passed
@haochengxia haochengxia deleted the hxia/cast branch February 2, 2026 04:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG]: Early cast when calculating cache size

1 participant