Release → 0.1.0 (Bedrock)

[revett]

Discussion topic for the upcoming 0.1.0 release, to discuss:

• Announcements of new beta release candidates
• Bugs found during testing
• Feedback from the community

Pre-releases:

• 0.1.0-beta.1

Install and test a pre-release via BRAT, and add any feedback/bugs as comments in this discussion.

See remaining work to be completed, before the official release is made.

[revett]

@kwame-Owusu @tabrejansary @AysajanE @emerardd @MFA-G @terminalchai @gitcommit90

Thanks for your contributions and helping to make 0.1.0 a reality 🙏

Please can you test the 0.1.0-beta.1 release using BRAT, and report back with feedback/bugs.

[kwame-Owusu]

lets goooooo!, I will make time to test it out and add any feedback when needed

[revett]

@snowyukitty Heads up on the upcoming release 👍

[revett]

@snowyukitty How did you find the project out of interest?

[revett]

Headsup that I just added a new release candidate → 0.1.0-beta.2

[kwame-Owusu]

love that we are inching closer to 0.1.0 🙌

[kwame-Owusu]

Had a little chance to test, and it seems to work fine, at least per how we want it to perform for 0.1.0-beta.1. other than that the remaining little bugs have been documented in the issues section. which we will need to work on to achieve 0.1.0 👍🏽.

[revett]

Awesome thanks 🚀

[terminalchai]

Tested 0.1.0-beta.1 through BRAT using Obsidian 1.13.4 on Windows with a local MinIO S3-compatible endpoint.

The connection test and initial sync completed successfully. I verified the uploaded manifest and note contents directly in the bucket.

One minor UX observation: an accidental leading space in the bucket field resulted in a generic Storage rejected the request (400) error. Correcting the value fixed it. Trimming or validating connection fields may make this easier to diagnose.

Otherwise, the tested flow is working correctly for me.

[revett]

Awesome! Thanks again for your contributions so far 🙏

[revett]

@terminalchai I've created #197, do you want to take that?

[terminalchai]

Thanks for creating #197 from my feedback. I’d be happy to help, but I see #199 is already addressing it, so I’ll avoid duplicating the work. I can retest the whitespace handling against my local MinIO setup once the change is ready.

[kwame-Owusu]

Just a little question, might be a little naive. But I know the project is fine with the usage of agents and I do use them here and there on the project but also do some contributions by writing the code manually. And I feel like the codebase is riddled with comments. are we intending of keeping it like so? because it does make it a little difficult to review changes, and navigating the codebase in terms of reading the code. And I know some functionality needs code comments because its not as intuitive to understand but certain functions that are easier to understand I feel do not need the comments, what do you guys think?

[revett]

Agree, fixing as part of #201

[revett]

Thanks for raising this feedback!

[revett]

Working on it within #204

[revett]

@kwame-Owusu Merged!

[kwame-Owusu]

Thank you! @revett 😁