Skip to content

Conversation

@POSTI-25
Copy link
Contributor

Created structs for Rule, Condition and Action

Rule: Connects one or more conditions to a specific action.
Condition: Represents a single check against a part of a URL (like its host or path).
Action: Defines the outcome of a rule match, specifying which browser and profile to use.

@POSTI-25 POSTI-25 changed the title Add structs for Rule, Condition, and Action #7 feat: Add structs for Rule, Condition, and Action #7 Oct 17, 2025
@theg1239
Copy link
Member

@codex review deeply

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

tauri-plugin-opener = "2"
serde = { version = "1", features = ["derive"] }
serde_json = "1"
uuid = { version = "1", features = ["v4"] }

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Enable serde support for uuid models

The newly added Rule/Condition/Action structs derive Serialize/Deserialize and Rule includes a Uuid, but the uuid dependency is declared with only the v4 feature. Without the serde feature enabled, Uuid does not implement Serialize/Deserialize, so any code that tries to compile these models (once they are referenced) will fail with missing trait implementations. Include the serde feature in the dependency declaration so the derives build successfully.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@POSTI-25 can you look into this?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hey. done. let me know if any more changes are required

@theg1239
Copy link
Member

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Breezy!

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@theg1239 theg1239 merged commit 0c53b62 into ACM-VIT:main Oct 18, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants