feat: Add super-slicing workload topology validation#933
Merged
Conversation
jamOne-
requested review from
FIoannides,
SikaGrr,
scaliby and
stony-tark
as code owners
|
🤖 Hi @jamOne-, I've received your request, and I'm working on it now! You can track my progress in the logs for more details. |
|
🤖 I'm sorry @jamOne-, but I was unable to process your request. Please see the logs for more details. |
scaliby
requested changes
Dec 10, 2025
scaliby
approved these changes
Dec 10, 2025
SikaGrr
approved these changes
Dec 10, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Super-slice topology allowed format: 4i x 4j x 4k (where i <= j <= k, and i, j, k are integers, with a maximum of 16x24x24)
Issue
http://b/465447813
Testing
Unit tests.