-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 72
Stack fault recovery #356
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Stack fault recovery #356
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
faf1ae5
debug_box: Read xpsr with vmpu_unpriv_uint32_read
Patater 8861082
vmpu: Fix style in vmpu_{arch}.c files
Patater 16dd8a2
Print the IRQ number of the non-system interrupt
Patater f8bd323
kinetis: Halt after debug fault
Patater ad9eb48
Update comment formatting in unvic_init
Patater f32d5ed
Set SVC one lower in priority
Patater 13f269f
vmpu: Replace 0x04 and 0x82 with CMSIS definitions
Patater 5d0f159
Recover from stacking errors
Patater File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Isn't this an overkill? The
context_validate_exc_sffunction does exactly the same check (reads with thetinstruction).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, the commit description spells it out as not really necessary, as a non-recoverable fault would happen in
context_validate_exc_sf, preventing further progress. As currently written, the unprivileged access instruction is not technically necessary.However, from the defensive coding perspective, it makes sense to use the unprivileged access instruction. Maybe the
context_validate_exc_sfgoes away on accident or has a bug introduced on accident. It's also nice to consistently have all places where uVisor accesses unprivileged memory using unprivileged access instructions.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍