Skip to content

board: E-OCR-CTC-SIMPLETEXT-1 + E-OCR-P6-GOLDEN-1 — the CTC correction + P6 golden suite shipped#664

Merged
AdaWorldAPI merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
claude/happy-hamilton-0azlw4
Jul 8, 2026
Merged

board: E-OCR-CTC-SIMPLETEXT-1 + E-OCR-P6-GOLDEN-1 — the CTC correction + P6 golden suite shipped#664
AdaWorldAPI merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
claude/happy-hamilton-0azlw4

Conversation

@AdaWorldAPI

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

What

Board-only (two prepended EPIPHANIES entries; companion to tesseract-rs #20):

  • E-OCR-CTC-SIMPLETEXT-1 — the arc's biggest correctness finding: every recognizer text anchor was decoded with simple_text=true, but eng.lstm's O1c111 head is NT_SOFTMAX = softmax activation with CTC loss → real SimpleTextOutput() is false. Both sides of every parity diff carried the same wrong flag (unfalsifiable on noise fixtures); the first rendered corpus page exposed it as systematic repeats. Entry carries the full 9-stage live-bisect method (gdb pix dump, argmax fingerprint, production beam params from registers), the fix (Network::simple_text_output() derived from the tree), and the 8/8 re-anchor. Transferable lessons: decode-semantics bugs need TEXT falsifiers; oracle config comments are claims, not facts.
  • E-OCR-P6-GOLDEN-1 — P6 shipped (hermetic corpus, tiered harness with the never-blur discipline operationalized, CER report: pages mean 0.0153 vs gt, perf report, CI wiring). The pdf-to-text-ocr-v1 plan is complete through P6. Meta-finding: the corpus paid for itself on first contact.

(The branch also carries the earlier E-OCR-LINEFEED-1 entry if #661 merged without it — all three entries are append-only prepends to the same file.)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_016b33swuXE23hKtqxsHu9p1


Generated by Claude Code

claude added 2 commits July 8, 2026 06:46
…plan complete through P6

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016b33swuXE23hKtqxsHu9p1
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@AdaWorldAPI, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 42 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 89302d05-d40d-41ea-b149-d504eabf89ea

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9a79920 and c3e5cb4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .claude/board/EPIPHANIES.md

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@AdaWorldAPI AdaWorldAPI merged commit 8109742 into main Jul 8, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants