Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
feat: BGE-M3 BF16 HDR lens + multi-lens voting — 99 tests bge_m3_lens.rs: second precision lens from BGE-M3 BF16 GGUF (dtype=30) - BF16→f32 via one shift: f32::from_bits((u16 as u32) << 16) - 256×256 HDR table std=73.6, CLAM 256 centroids - vote_distance(): compare Jina vs BGE-M3, return agreement 0.0-1.0 - 5 tests (size, diagonal, variance, vote) data/bge-m3-hdr/: 64 KB table + 488 KB index baked in Both lenses from same XLM-RoBERTa base, different training: Jina F16: cos[-0.067, 0.234], std=73.6 BGE-M3 BF16: cos[-0.090, 0.248], std=73.6 Multi-lens agreement → NARS confidence boost. Jina reranker v3 BF16 downloading for relevance precision lens. Reranker = cross-encoder relevance score, not embedding distance. Could gate cascade transitions: "is this pair actually relevant?" 99 tests pass. https://claude.ai/code/session_01ChLvBfpJS8dQhHxRD4pYNp #95
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
feat: BGE-M3 BF16 HDR lens + multi-lens voting — 99 tests bge_m3_lens.rs: second precision lens from BGE-M3 BF16 GGUF (dtype=30) - BF16→f32 via one shift: f32::from_bits((u16 as u32) << 16) - 256×256 HDR table std=73.6, CLAM 256 centroids - vote_distance(): compare Jina vs BGE-M3, return agreement 0.0-1.0 - 5 tests (size, diagonal, variance, vote) data/bge-m3-hdr/: 64 KB table + 488 KB index baked in Both lenses from same XLM-RoBERTa base, different training: Jina F16: cos[-0.067, 0.234], std=73.6 BGE-M3 BF16: cos[-0.090, 0.248], std=73.6 Multi-lens agreement → NARS confidence boost. Jina reranker v3 BF16 downloading for relevance precision lens. Reranker = cross-encoder relevance score, not embedding distance. Could gate cascade transitions: "is this pair actually relevant?" 99 tests pass. https://claude.ai/code/session_01ChLvBfpJS8dQhHxRD4pYNp #95
Changes from all commits
fc76adcaea9f7bcfb244c9af0626f8ca085b1d4f0eabb7849d24e5622663aea6e8c395c9e82a38dee8afda908ea8b716216b3bce5File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Jump to
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There are no files selected for viewing
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.