Skip to content

fix(ci): publish SDK workflow types before SDK#807

Merged
khaliqgant merged 1 commit intomainfrom
codex/publish-workflow-types-before-sdk
Apr 30, 2026
Merged

fix(ci): publish SDK workflow types before SDK#807
khaliqgant merged 1 commit intomainfrom
codex/publish-workflow-types-before-sdk

Conversation

@khaliqgant
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@khaliqgant khaliqgant commented Apr 30, 2026

Summary

  • publish @agent-relay/config, @agent-relay/github-primitive, and @agent-relay/workflow-types before @agent-relay/sdk for all/sdk release flows
  • add a workflow-types-only publish option to repair partial releases such as sdk@6.0.4 requiring workflow-types@6.0.4
  • harden published SDK verification to wait for exact-version internal deps and import @agent-relay/sdk/workflows

Context

The Daytona/Bun bootstrap failed with: Cannot find module @agent-relay/workflow-types from @agent-relay/sdk@6.0.4. Registry checks confirmed sdk@6.0.4 declares @agent-relay/workflow-types@6.0.4, but npm only has workflow-types@6.0.3.

Verification

  • npm --prefix packages/workflow-types run build
  • npm --prefix packages/sdk run check
  • ruby YAML parse for publish.yml and verify-publish-sdk.yml
  • actionlint -shellcheck= .github/workflows/publish.yml .github/workflows/verify-publish-sdk.yml
  • git diff --check -- .github/workflows/publish.yml .github/workflows/verify-publish-sdk.yml

Open in Devin Review

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@devin-ai-integration devin-ai-integration Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✅ Devin Review: No Issues Found

Devin Review analyzed this PR and found no potential bugs to report.

View in Devin Review to see 3 additional findings.

Open in Devin Review

@khaliqgant khaliqgant merged commit 965b060 into main Apr 30, 2026
37 checks passed
@khaliqgant khaliqgant deleted the codex/publish-workflow-types-before-sdk branch April 30, 2026 17:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant