cleanup: migrate e2e + conformance scripts from HS256 to RS256#62
Merged
khaliqgant merged 1 commit intomainfrom Apr 24, 2026
Merged
cleanup: migrate e2e + conformance scripts from HS256 to RS256#62khaliqgant merged 1 commit intomainfrom
khaliqgant merged 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
Replace the relayfile e2e and conformance script HS256 shared-secret token minting with RS256 tokens signed by a startup-generated RSA keypair and served through a local JWKS endpoint. This is needed because post-relayfile#60 the server rejects HS256 tokens, which broke the local dev harnesses during seeded API calls. The change is limited to dev scripts and their test utility; no production Go paths or runtime packages are affected. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Note: the requested local branch name was cleanup/e2e-scripts-rs256, but the remote already has refs/heads/cleanup, so GitHub rejected creating a cleanup/* branch. This PR uses the non-conflicting remote branch cleanup-e2e-scripts-rs256 with the same commit.
Test plan