Update AnalysisDataModel.h

[ddobrigk]

@aalkin @ktf I believe this extra equivalency declaration is needed to make a trick of the strangeness builders work. In the trick, I subscribe only to TracksExtra and I de-reference an index to tracks directly to TracksExtra so that I avoid declaring separate process functions for Tracks and TracksIU - with the versioning of TracksExtra to 002, the trick was unfortunately broken, and I think an equivalency of A-B and another of B-C doesn't mean, in the framework, that A-C is made equivalent. Can you please check and merge if you agree? Thank you!

[github-actions]

REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION RELEASES:
To request your PR to be included in production software, please add the corresponding labels called "async-" to your PR. Add the labels directly (if you have the permissions) or add a comment of the form (note that labels are separated by a ",")

+async-label <label1>, <label2>, !<label3> ...

This will add <label1> and <label2> and removes <label3>.

The following labels are available
async-2023-pbpb-apass4
async-2023-pp-apass4
async-2024-pp-apass1
async-2022-pp-apass7
async-2024-pp-cpass0
async-2024-PbPb-apass1
async-2024-ppRef-apass1

[aalkin]

@ddobrigk you are right, currently the equivalence is not transitive. However, with the new mechanism behind the tables, I will later make it so anything with the same description is considered equivalent, so these declarations will not be needed anymore.