Skip to content

Conversation

@aalkin
Copy link
Member

@aalkin aalkin commented May 8, 2025

Reverts #14057 - the slicing cache is erroneously skipped when there is at least one process function with the same grouping that is disabled

@aalkin aalkin requested a review from a team as a code owner May 8, 2025 16:16
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented May 8, 2025

REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION RELEASES:
To request your PR to be included in production software, please add the corresponding labels called "async-" to your PR. Add the labels directly (if you have the permissions) or add a comment of the form (note that labels are separated by a ",")

+async-label <label1>, <label2>, !<label3> ...

This will add <label1> and <label2> and removes <label3>.

The following labels are available
async-2023-pbpb-apass4
async-2023-pp-apass4
async-2024-pp-apass1
async-2022-pp-apass7
async-2024-pp-cpass0
async-2024-PbPb-apass1
async-2024-ppRef-apass1
async-2024-PbPb-apass2
async-2023-PbPb-apass5

@aalkin aalkin requested a review from ktf May 8, 2025 16:16
@ktf ktf merged commit 440e500 into AliceO2Group:dev May 8, 2025
7 checks passed
@aalkin aalkin deleted the revert-14057-slice-cache-improvement branch December 11, 2025 09:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants