Skip to content

Fixes for ROFs downscaling for ITS tracking#15411

Merged
shahor02 merged 1 commit into
AliceO2Group:devfrom
shahor02:pr_fastmult
May 20, 2026
Merged

Fixes for ROFs downscaling for ITS tracking#15411
shahor02 merged 1 commit into
AliceO2Group:devfrom
shahor02:pr_fastmult

Conversation

@shahor02
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No description provided.

if (!trig.empty() && multEstConf.preferTriggered) {
LOGP(debug, "FastMultEst preferTriggered is ignored in trigger-driven mask mode");
for (auto& rof : selROFs) {
if (rof.priority >= 0 & (multEstConf.cutRandomFraction <= 0.f || (gRandom->Rndm() > multEstConf.cutRandomFraction))) {
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess the CI complains correctly here and it should be:

Suggested change
if (rof.priority >= 0 & (multEstConf.cutRandomFraction <= 0.f || (gRandom->Rndm() > multEstConf.cutRandomFraction))) {
if (rof.priority >= 0 && (multEstConf.cutRandomFraction <= 0.f || (gRandom->Rndm() > multEstConf.cutRandomFraction))) {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

indeed.

@shahor02
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

CI failures are due to the changed ccdb access, validated locally, merging.

@shahor02 shahor02 merged commit 2e26434 into AliceO2Group:dev May 20, 2026
8 of 12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants