Skip to content

Conversation

@knopers8
Copy link
Collaborator

A label for matching the correct CompletionPolicy in BookkeepingQualitySink was missing. This was causing it to wait indefinitely for matching inputs for the same timeslice if QOs from different Data Processors were requested. The change allows BookkeepingQualitySink to consume the inputs immediatelly and pass them to any other process which may also need them.

A label for matching the correct CompletionPolicy in BookkeepingQualitySink was missing. This was causing it to wait indefinitely for matching inputs for the same timeslice if QOs from different Data Processors were requested.
The change allows BookkeepingQualitySink to consume the inputs immediatelly and pass them to any other process which may also need them.
Copy link
Collaborator

@justonedev1 justonedev1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thank you

@knopers8
Copy link
Collaborator Author

The command below with the provided configuration file reproduces the issue observed by Robert. With this fix, the reproducer behaves OK.

o2-qc-run-producer | o2-qc --config json://home/pkonopka/alice/QualityControl/Framework/basic.json

basic.json

@knopers8 knopers8 enabled auto-merge (squash) October 30, 2024 10:19
@knopers8 knopers8 merged commit e1052ca into AliceO2Group:master Oct 30, 2024
@knopers8 knopers8 deleted the fix-sync-bkp branch October 30, 2024 12:51
Barthelemy pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2024
A label for matching the correct CompletionPolicy in BookkeepingQualitySink was missing. This was causing it to wait indefinitely for matching inputs for the same timeslice if QOs from different Data Processors were requested.
The change allows BookkeepingQualitySink to consume the inputs immediatelly and pass them to any other process which may also need them.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants