Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add radius to DO_REPOSITION #240

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 19, 2022

Conversation

magicrub
Copy link

Add Radius to CMD_DO_REPOSIITON for better atomic operations of control on guided commands. It uses language from the other CMD_NAV_LOITER commands

@magicrub
Copy link
Author

upstream PR mavlink#1787

@magicrub
Copy link
Author

I've discussed this with @WickedShell who's in favor of it.

@magicrub
Copy link
Author

I'm having second thoughts about this. Would probably be better to just use a new enum entry in MAV_DO_REPOSITION_FLAGS to say radius is included and overrides the yaw value for planes

@magicrub
Copy link
Author

I've updated the upstream PR mavlink#1825

@magicrub
Copy link
Author

magicrub commented Apr 9, 2022

This was discussed at the mavlink dev call per comment mavlink#1825 (comment) and the upstream PR was updated. I'll make an ardupilot/ardupilot PR but we don't necessarily need to update mavlink quite yet. It's just utilizing an existing unused param3

@magicrub
Copy link
Author

magicrub commented Apr 9, 2022

Ardupilot implementation: ArduPilot/ardupilot#19860

@magicrub
Copy link
Author

upstream merged mavlink#1825

@magicrub
Copy link
Author

can someone please merge this

Copy link

@peterbarker peterbarker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same as upstream and previously discussed.

@peterbarker peterbarker merged commit eca7b73 into ArduPilot:master May 19, 2022
@magicrub magicrub deleted the do_reposition_radius branch May 23, 2022 21:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants