This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 7, 2023. It is now read-only.
WIP: Implementing the ruby linter#1
Merged
hd-deman merged 1 commit intoAtomLinter:masterfrom Jul 1, 2014
lucasmazza:lm-linter-ruby
Merged
WIP: Implementing the ruby linter#1hd-deman merged 1 commit intoAtomLinter:masterfrom lucasmazza:lm-linter-ruby
hd-deman merged 1 commit intoAtomLinter:masterfrom
lucasmazza:lm-linter-ruby
Conversation
Member
|
👍 |
hd-deman
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 1, 2014
WIP: Implementing the ruby linter
Member
|
Please update readme |
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I noticed this empty repo and since I want to use a plain ruby linter instead of Rubocop, I decided to take a shot on implementing the linter based on the other ones that I'm already using. This PR is still lacking a proper README update but already has some working code. Let me know what you guys think of this and I can push the README changes later.