refactor worktree into smaller components#138
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @webdevcody, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly improves the architecture of the worktree management feature by refactoring a large component into a more modular and maintainable design. The change introduces a new Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request is an excellent refactoring of the WorktreeSelector component. Breaking down the monolithic component into smaller, more manageable components and custom hooks significantly improves the code's readability, maintainability, and testability. The new file structure is logical and follows best practices for React development.
I've found one high-severity issue related to state management in the new useBranches hook, which was likely carried over from the original implementation. The state for branch information is shared across all worktree tabs, which can lead to incorrect data being displayed. My review comment provides details on the issue and a suggested fix.
Overall, this is a great step forward for the codebase.
| const { | ||
| branches, | ||
| filteredBranches, | ||
| aheadCount, | ||
| behindCount, | ||
| isLoadingBranches, | ||
| branchFilter, | ||
| setBranchFilter, | ||
| resetBranchFilter, | ||
| fetchBranches, | ||
| } = useBranches(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The useBranches hook is called once for the entire WorktreePanel, which causes all WorktreeTab components to share the same state for branches, aheadCount, behindCount, and branchFilter. This is incorrect because this data is specific to each worktree. For example, opening the dropdown for one worktree will fetch its branch data and overwrite the state for all other tabs.
To fix this, the state from useBranches should be scoped to each individual WorktreeTab. You can achieve this by creating a new component that wraps WorktreeTab and calls useBranches inside it. This new component would then be rendered inside the .map() loop, ensuring each tab has its own isolated branch state.
No description provided.