category

[webdevcody]

Changes from branch category

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Category autocomplete now supports creating new categories directly from the search field without leaving the interface.
  • Added error state indication for the category selection field for improved user feedback.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Note

Other AI code review bot(s) detected

CodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review.

Walkthrough

A new TypeScript declaration file for Next.js types is added, and the category autocomplete component is extended with support for creating new categories, including an optional error prop and new configuration for the create functionality. Test utilities for the new create feature are also added.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Next.js Type Declarations apps/app/next-env.d.ts	New TypeScript ambient type reference file for Next.js with references to Next.js types and routes type definitions.
Category Autocomplete Enhancement apps/ui/src/components/ui/category-autocomplete.tsx	Added optional error prop to component and interface; imported Tag icon from lucide-react; extended underlying Autocomplete with allowCreate, custom createLabel, error state, and icon; updated search placeholder text.
Autocomplete Test Utilities apps/ui/tests/utils/components/autocomplete.ts	Added two new test helper functions: clickCreateNewCategoryOption() and getCreateNewCategoryOption() for interacting with the new create category option in tests.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes

• apps/ui/src/components/ui/category-autocomplete.tsx: Verify proper propagation of the new error prop through the component; confirm the Tag icon import and usage is correct; validate that allowCreate and createLabel configurations integrate properly with the underlying Autocomplete component.
• apps/ui/tests/utils/components/autocomplete.ts: Confirm the data-testid selectors match the actual rendered elements in the component.

Poem

🐰 A tag, a create, a new way to be,
Categories sprout from your autocomplete spree,
With error states bright and icons so fine,
New categories grow on your testing vine! 🌱✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 75.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title 'category' is a single generic word that does not clearly summarize the main changes in the pull request.	Use a more descriptive title that clarifies the actual changes, such as 'Add category creation and error handling to autocomplete' or 'Implement category autocomplete with create option'.

✅ Passed checks (1 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch category

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 334b82b and 36b4bd6.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• apps/app/next-env.d.ts (1 hunks)
• apps/ui/src/components/ui/category-autocomplete.tsx (4 hunks)
• apps/ui/tests/utils/components/autocomplete.ts (1 hunks)

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• apps/app/next-env.d.ts

🔇 Additional comments (1)

apps/ui/src/components/ui/category-autocomplete.tsx (1)

2-2: LGTM! Well-integrated create functionality.

The changes properly extend the category autocomplete with create capability:

• Tag icon import and usage is appropriate for category context
• Error prop is correctly typed as optional with sensible default
• Updated searchPlaceholder clearly communicates the new create capability
• All new props (error, icon, allowCreate, createLabel) are properly passed through to the underlying Autocomplete component
• The dynamic createLabel function provides good UX feedback

Also applies to: 12-12, 23-23, 32-32, 36-39

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @webdevcody, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request significantly enhances the CategoryAutocomplete component by introducing the ability for users to create new categories on the fly and providing a clear visual error state. These changes improve the component's usability and feedback mechanisms, with corresponding updates to test utilities to ensure robust coverage of the new features.

Highlights

• Category Creation: The CategoryAutocomplete component now allows users to create new categories directly from the input field, enhancing user flexibility.
• Error State Support: An error prop has been introduced to the CategoryAutocomplete component, enabling it to visually indicate an error state.
• Icon Integration: A Tag icon from lucide-react has been integrated into the CategoryAutocomplete component for improved visual representation.
• Test Utilities: New utility functions have been added to autocomplete.ts to facilitate testing of the new 'create new category' functionality.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request enhances the CategoryAutocomplete component by adding support for creating new categories, displaying an error state, and showing an icon. Corresponding test helper functions have also been added. The changes to the component look good. My review includes a couple of suggestions for the new test helpers to improve code clarity and maintainability by removing redundant async keywords and reducing code duplication.

[gemini-code-assist]

To improve maintainability and avoid duplicating the selector logic, this line can be changed to call the getCreateNewCategoryOption helper function. This makes the code more DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself).

Note that if you also apply my other suggestion to make getCreateNewCategoryOption synchronous, you should remove the await keyword from the suggested code.

Suggested change

	const option = page.locator('[data-testid="category-option-create-new"]');
	const option = await getCreateNewCategoryOption(page);

[gemini-code-assist]

The getCreateNewCategoryOption function is marked as async and specifies a Promise<Locator> return type, but the implementation with page.locator() is synchronous and returns a Locator. To make the function signature more accurate and the code clearer, you can remove the async keyword and update the return type to Locator.

Suggested change

	export async function getCreateNewCategoryOption(
	page: Page
	): Promise<Locator> {
	export function getCreateNewCategoryOption(
	page: Page
	): Locator {