working on improving the app spec page#94
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @webdevcody, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request focuses on enhancing the application's specification (spec) page and its underlying processes. It introduces greater control over spec generation by allowing users to specify whether to analyze their existing codebase or automatically generate features. The user interface for Kanban cards has been upgraded to visually represent feature priorities and dynamically arrange status badges. Additionally, the backend architecture for spec regeneration has been modularized, improving maintainability and introducing a new logging system. These changes collectively aim to provide a more intuitive and robust experience for defining and managing project specifications. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a significant and valuable refactoring of the server-side spec regeneration logic, breaking it down into more manageable and modular components. The addition of a dedicated logger and the init.sh script are great improvements for maintainability and developer experience. The UI/UX enhancements on the spec page, including better state management and new generation options, are also well-executed. I've found one high-severity issue in the new server code where a streamed response from the agent is not being handled correctly, which could lead to incomplete data. Please see the specific comment for details.
| if (msg.type === "assistant" && msg.message.content) { | ||
| for (const block of msg.message.content) { | ||
| if (block.type === "text") { | ||
| responseText = block.text; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There seems to be a potential bug here. responseText is being overwritten with each new text block from the stream, instead of being concatenated. If the JSON response from the agent is streamed in multiple chunks, this will result in an incomplete JSON string, capturing only the last part of the response. This is inconsistent with the fix applied in auto-mode-service.ts and the logic in generate-spec.ts.
It should be responseText += block.text; to accumulate the full response.
| responseText = block.text; | |
| responseText += block.text; |
| for (const block of msg.message.content) { | ||
| if (block.type === "text") { | ||
| responseText = block.text || ""; | ||
| responseText += block.text || ""; |
- Removed the old spec regeneration routes and replaced them with a new structure under the app-spec directory for better modularity. - Introduced unit tests for common functionalities in app-spec, covering state management and error handling. - Added documentation on route organization patterns to improve maintainability and clarity for future development.
No description provided.