Skip to content

Changed default time for action_timeout from 300 to 1800 sec#705

Merged
sazid merged 1 commit into
devfrom
action-timeout-time-change
Jun 22, 2026
Merged

Changed default time for action_timeout from 300 to 1800 sec#705
sazid merged 1 commit into
devfrom
action-timeout-time-change

Conversation

@mdshakib007

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Changed default time for action_timeout from 300 to 1800 sec

@mdshakib007 mdshakib007 self-assigned this Jun 22, 2026
@riz-hossain

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🔎 ZeuZ PR Review

Open the full report in ZeuZ: Review findings and apply suggestions

Overview Value
Agents ✅ 4 completed
Suggestions 💡 2

Agent breakdown

→ General Review

Status: ✅ Completed
Suggestions: 0 suggestions

No actionable issues found in this diff; the default timeout change is applied consistently in both the worker and driver paths.

→ Security Review

Status: ✅ Completed
Suggestions: 0 suggestions

No security findings in this diff. The change only increases the default action timeout from 300 to 1800 seconds, which affects availability/behavior but does not introduce a clear injection, auth, secrets, or data exposure issue.

→ Performance Review

Status: ✅ Completed
Suggestions: 1 suggestion

The change increases the default action timeout from 5 minutes to 30 minutes, which raises the worst-case duration that a stuck worker thread and its held resources can remain occupied. No other performance regressions are evident in the diff.

→ Testing Review

Status: ✅ Completed
Suggestions: 1 suggestion

The change updates the default action_timeout in two production paths, but there’s no regression coverage proving the new 1800-second default is applied or that an explicit user-supplied timeout still wins.

Open ZeuZ to inspect full findings, continue an agent conversation, or apply safe patch suggestions.

@sazid sazid merged commit 32aa285 into dev Jun 22, 2026
7 checks passed
@sazid sazid deleted the action-timeout-time-change branch June 22, 2026 15:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants