Include AI acknowledgement in GitHub PR template

[fredrikekelund]

Related issues

See pesfPa-1Nc-p2

Proposed Changes

Update the GitHub PR template to include a "How AI was used in this PR" section. This is a completely free-form section, aimed at helping code reviewers understand how to approach the PR. It's also a good place to acknowledge that you've reviewed the code, or that it's more of a vibe-coded PR.

See #2690 for an example of how we might use this section.

Testing Instructions

N/A

Pre-merge Checklist

• Have you checked for TypeScript, React or other console errors?

[nightnei]

LGTM 👍

[nightnei]

👍

[katinthehatsite]

It's also a good place to acknowledge that you've reviewed the code, or that it's more of a vibe-coded PR.

I thought we are supposed to review everything in our own PRs 🙈

[katinthehatsite]

The changes look good 👍

[wojtekn]

I thought we are supposed to review everything in our own PRs 🙈

Ideally, we do. I understand the intention to let author confirm one of the following:

• I wrote the PR myself
• I used AI to create PR, but reviewed it thoroughly, and I'm confident about the code
• I used AI to create PR, but haven't reviewed it much
• I used AI to create PR, but I don't fully understand the code
• etc.

[fredrikekelund]

I thought we are supposed to review everything in our own PRs 🙈

What @wojtekn said 🙂

We are indeed supposed to do that, but the reality is that it varies based on several factors (many of which are completely legitimate, even if laziness probably also sneaks in on occasion).

Aside from helping reviewers, I think this will also help PR authors pause and reflect before submitting the PR: Did I really review all of the code? Have I actually looked at the test implementation? Am I confident about the root cause of the bug I'm fixing?

Lastly, it'll be helpful for fully vibe-coded PRs. We already know when PRs are vibe-coded, but it should be clearly acknowledged.