Skip to content

Conversation

@defkit
Copy link
Contributor

@defkit defkit commented Dec 29, 2025

For some reason worflow disappeared from https://github.com/AztecProtocol/aztec-packages/pull/19133/files

@defkit defkit requested a review from Sarkoxed December 29, 2025 07:05
@defkit defkit requested a review from charlielye as a code owner December 29, 2025 07:05
Copy link
Contributor

@Sarkoxed Sarkoxed left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved

@AztecBot AztecBot force-pushed the sn/fix_worklfow_fuzzing_avm branch from db0e09b to 25f1913 Compare December 29, 2025 12:49
@AztecBot AztecBot added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 29, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Dec 29, 2025
@defkit defkit added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 29, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Dec 29, 2025
@defkit
Copy link
Contributor Author

defkit commented Dec 29, 2025

it seems ci is on vacation, 2 different not related errors 🤔

@defkit defkit added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 29, 2025
@AztecBot
Copy link
Collaborator

AztecBot commented Dec 29, 2025

Flakey Tests

🤖 says: This CI run detected 1 tests that failed, but were tolerated due to a .test_patterns.yml entry.

\033FLAKED\033 (\0338;;http://ci.aztec-labs.com/ade778266943a05d�ade778266943a05d8;;�\033):  yarn-project/end-to-end/scripts/run_test.sh simple src/e2e_p2p/multiple_validators_sentinel.parallel.test.ts "collects attestations for validators in proposer node when block is not published" (109s) (code: 1) group:e2e-p2p-epoch-flakes (\033defkit\033: chore(fuzzing_avm): fuzzing avm build workflow (#19264))

Merged via the queue into next with commit 4814166 Dec 29, 2025
18 checks passed
@defkit defkit deleted the sn/fix_worklfow_fuzzing_avm branch December 29, 2025 13:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants