Skip to content

[Automation] Generate SDK based on TypeSpec 0.44.5#48826

Merged
weidongxu-microsoft merged 2 commits intoAzure:mainfrom
azure-sdk:typespec-java-generation-6163981
Apr 17, 2026
Merged

[Automation] Generate SDK based on TypeSpec 0.44.5#48826
weidongxu-microsoft merged 2 commits intoAzure:mainfrom
azure-sdk:typespec-java-generation-6163981

Conversation

@azure-sdk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

[Automation] Generate SDK based on TypeSpec 0.44.5

@azure-sdk azure-sdk added the DPG label Apr 16, 2026
@weidongxu-microsoft weidongxu-microsoft marked this pull request as ready for review April 17, 2026 02:17
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 17, 2026 02:17
@weidongxu-microsoft
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/azp run java - elastic

@azure-pipelines
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates the TypeSpec Java emitter dependency used by the repo’s TypeSpec generation workflow to align with TypeSpec 0.44.5.

Changes:

  • Bumps @azure-tools/typespec-java from 0.44.3 to 0.44.5 in eng/emitter-package.json.
  • Updates eng/emitter-package-lock.json to reflect the new emitter version (and regenerates lockfile entries).

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File Description
eng/emitter-package.json Updates the pinned TypeSpec Java emitter version to 0.44.5.
eng/emitter-package-lock.json Updates the lockfile for the new emitter version; also rewrites many resolved/integrity fields based on the registry used during lock generation.
Files not reviewed (1)
  • eng/emitter-package-lock.json: Language not supported

Comment thread eng/emitter-package-lock.json
@weidongxu-microsoft weidongxu-microsoft merged commit 6255660 into Azure:main Apr 17, 2026
34 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants