Renaming CLI properties for cosmosdbNoSql #991
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ayush3797
requested review from
Aniruddh25,
JelteF,
Mathos1432,
aaronburtle,
aaronpowell,
abhishekkumams,
gledis69,
jarupatj,
junsu0ms,
mbhaskar,
milismsft,
ravishetye,
seantleonard,
severussundar and
tarazou9
as code owners
severussundar
approved these changes
Nov 23, 2022
abhishekkumams
approved these changes
Nov 23, 2022
ayush3797
deleted the
dev/agarwalayush/renamingCosmosPropertiesInDabInitCmd
branch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why make this change?
As a follow up to this PR: #980, changing the property names
cosmos-containerandcosmos-databasetocosmosdb_nosql-containerandcosmosdb_nosql-databaserespectively so that the names fall in sync with thecosmosdb_nosqldatabase-type.What is this change?
Renaming of the options used in dab init command and the corresponding properties in Options class.
How was this tested?
No tests required, just refactoring work.