Skip to content

Conversation

@lukeyeager
Copy link
Contributor

datum.label=None is preferable to datum.label=0.

@lukeyeager
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ping? I feel like the odds of breaking existing workflows should be pretty low. If they're not specifying a label, then I can't see why they would be reading it later.

@seanbell
Copy link

LGTM.

@shelhamer

@shelhamer
Copy link
Member

Looks good. Thanks for this and the IO care in general @lukeyeager, and thanks for signaling this @seanbell.

@shelhamer shelhamer merged commit 5166583 into BVLC:master Apr 20, 2016
@lukeyeager lukeyeager deleted the bvlc/array_to_datum-default-label branch April 20, 2016 22:10
fxbit pushed a commit to Yodigram/caffe that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2016
…ult-label

Don't force datum.label=0 in array_to_datum
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants