This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 17, 2025. It is now read-only.
Biweekly Fee Report (v1 and v2) ending 2025-03-27 #363
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
requested review from
Xeonus,
Zen-Maxi,
gosuto-inzasheru and
jalbrekt85
Contributor
|
total incentives appear to be 1wei too high; this is ok since balance is 1wei higher as well but needs a 1wei increase in the approval |
Fix rounding error Co-authored-by: gosuto.eth <gosuto@inzasheru.email>
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Checks before merging:
total_incentives+fees_to_vebal+fees_to_dao== usdc onchainaura_incentives/total_incentives~= aurabal's vebal capture (https://app.aura.finance/#/stats)earned_fees<= total_swept onchain (per chain)fees_to_dao/ (fees_to_vebal+fees_to_dao+total_incentives) == .175min(aura_incentives)> thresholdmin(bal_incentives)> threshold