Skip to content

AUR Reviewer Response

Muhammad Dhiyaul Atha edited this page Apr 1, 2026 · 1 revision

AUR Reviewer Response

Thank you for the review and for taking the time to evaluate ATHA.

I agree that tools in AUR should provide clear value beyond simply wrapping existing commands. ATHA has been updated to introduce workflow-level features on top of pacman:

  • Install planning with transaction simulation and source visibility (official, AUR, or skipped)
  • Distinct planning and simulation modes:
    • --plan for decision analysis (what will happen and why)
    • --dry-run for execution simulation (what command would run)
  • Confirmation layer for package-changing actions
  • Persistent operation history via atha history with timeline, summary, and filters
  • Built-in validation and runtime/system checks via atha doctor

ATHA preserves native pacman behavior while improving safety, transparency, and usability for daily workflows.

I will continue maintaining the package and iterating based on technical feedback. If there are specific concerns regarding implementation quality or redundancy, I am happy to address them with concrete improvements and follow-up releases.

Thank you again for your time and review.


Evidence Checklist Before Posting

  • README includes value positioning and unique behavior details
  • Command documentation includes plan, dry-run, history, and doctor features
  • Release notes reflect delivered improvements and UX consistency updates
  • AUR package metadata is synchronized with the current release

Clone this wiki locally