-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Add server tests #24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add server tests #24
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @niteshbalusu11, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request introduces a comprehensive suite of server-side tests, significantly improving the test coverage for both public and authenticated API endpoints. It includes the necessary dependency additions and minor refactorings to enable robust testing of the server's functionality.
Highlights
- New Test Suite: A dedicated server/src/tests module has been added, containing new unit and integration tests for the server's API endpoints.
- API Endpoint Testing: Extensive tests have been implemented for key gated API endpoints such as user registration, push token management, user information retrieval, and LN address updates. Public API endpoints like getk1 and lnurlp_request are also now covered by tests.
- Dependency Updates: New development dependencies including tower, tracing-test, and hdrhistogram have been added to support the new testing infrastructure.
- API Response Struct Refactoring: Several API response structs across gated_api_v0.rs and public_api_v0.rs have been updated with Deserialize derives and public fields to facilitate easier deserialization and testing of API responses.
- Route Method Change: The /user_info API route has been changed from a GET request to a POST request.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request adds a comprehensive set of server tests, which is a great step towards ensuring the application's stability and correctness. The changes to make response structs deserializable and their fields public for testing purposes are reasonable. I've identified a few areas in the new test code where refactoring could reduce duplication and improve maintainability. My comments focus on these opportunities for improvement.
No description provided.