refactor: split NoahTools nitro module into smaller files #43
Conversation
niteshbalusu11
commented
Sep 16, 2025
niteshbalusu11
commented
- Split iOS NoahTools.swift into separate files for HTTP, logging, and backup functionality
- Split Android NoahTools.kt into separate Kotlin objects for HTTP, logging, and backup
- Main NoahTools classes now delegate to helper extensions/objects
- Improves code organization and maintainability
- Split iOS NoahTools.swift into separate files for HTTP, logging, and backup functionality - Split Android NoahTools.kt into separate Kotlin objects for HTTP, logging, and backup - Main NoahTools classes now delegate to helper extensions/objects - Improves code organization and maintainability
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @niteshbalusu11, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request introduces a significant refactoring of the NoahTools module across both iOS and Android platforms. The primary goal is to improve the modularity and maintainability of the codebase by breaking down a monolithic class into several specialized components. This change centralizes related functionalities, making the code easier to understand, test, and extend in the future.
Highlights
- Code Organization: The core
NoahToolsmodule for both iOS (Swift) and Android (Kotlin) has been refactored to delegate its responsibilities to smaller, more focused helper files/objects. - Platform-Specific Splitting: On iOS, the
NoahTools.swiftfile is now split intoNoahToolsHttp.swift,NoahToolsLogging.swift, andNoahToolsBackup.swiftextensions. Similarly, on Android,NoahTools.ktis split intoNoahToolsHttp.kt,NoahToolsLogging.kt, andNoahToolsBackup.ktobjects. - Improved Maintainability: This refactoring significantly enhances code organization and maintainability by separating concerns (HTTP, logging, backup) into distinct, manageable units.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request is a great step forward in improving the codebase's structure. Splitting the monolithic NoahTools class into smaller, feature-specific files for both Android and iOS significantly enhances modularity and maintainability. The delegation pattern used in the main NoahTools classes is clean and effective. I've identified a critical bug in the Android unzipping logic that could lead to an infinite loop, along with some opportunities to improve code style and robustness in both platforms. Please see my detailed comments below.
