Skip to content

Conversation

@robertleeplummerjr
Copy link
Contributor

…ural networks

Fixes #294

A GIF or MEME to give some spice of the internet

Description

Motivation and Context

issue

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Author's Checklist:

  • My code focuses on the main motivation and avoids scope creep.
  • My code passes current tests and adds new tests where possible.
  • My code is SOLID and DRY.
  • I have updated the documentation as needed.

Reviewer's Checklist:

  • I kept my comments to the author positive, specific, and productive.
  • I tested the code and didn't find any new problems.
  • I think the motivation is good for the project.
  • I think the code works to satisfies the motivation.

@robertleeplummerjr robertleeplummerjr merged commit 0f98db9 into master Nov 4, 2018
@robertleeplummerjr robertleeplummerjr deleted the 294-hidden-size-fix branch November 4, 2018 19:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Different size RNN hidden layers don't map properly

2 participants