Skip to content

objectify scenario model (fixes #522)#554

Merged
yasuhiro-ohba merged 2 commits intov3.0from
feature/522-objectify-scenario
Nov 19, 2025
Merged

objectify scenario model (fixes #522)#554
yasuhiro-ohba merged 2 commits intov3.0from
feature/522-objectify-scenario

Conversation

@skxeve
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@skxeve skxeve commented Oct 21, 2025

Brief

Fixes #522, and refactor below:

  1. queueing step instance from list to StepObject or NamedTuple directly.
  2. eliminate MultiProcWithConfigExecutor, it is unified to MultiProcExecutor.

Points to Check

  • Any unforeseen impact
  • The overall quality is trending positively

Test

Confirmed

Pass ALL CI.

Review Limit

  • Write review limit on pull request title.

@skxeve skxeve added this to the v3.0 milestone Oct 21, 2025
@skxeve skxeve self-assigned this Oct 21, 2025
@skxeve skxeve added the redesign Changes that improve interface and implementation without changing output. label Oct 21, 2025
@skxeve skxeve linked an issue Oct 21, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
Base automatically changed from feature/523-strategize-scenario-manager to v3.0 November 19, 2025 02:22
@yasuhiro-ohba yasuhiro-ohba merged commit 94ef901 into v3.0 Nov 19, 2025
8 checks passed
@yasuhiro-ohba yasuhiro-ohba deleted the feature/522-objectify-scenario branch November 19, 2025 02:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

redesign Changes that improve interface and implementation without changing output.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Objectify scenario data

2 participants