Replies: 1 comment
Yes, especially if we want to have dynamic field numbers, it would make to many modules at the same level. Flattening at the stack level could already be a great simplification in term of module communication, especially to handle connecting stack together. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
In v1 we opted for a "nested" structure: the workspace contains stack, with each containing blocks with each containing fields. This could also be arranged in a "flat" structure, where the workspace contains stack and block objects and association is tracked via "links" (i.e. IDs).
All reactions