Skip to content

docs: Update README with USP optimization results #24

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 2, 2025
Merged

docs: Update README with USP optimization results #24

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
eb70506
docs: Update README with USP optimization results
claude Nov 2, 2025
374eff7
Merge branch 'main' into claude/check-code-011CUf7NJcXsSSKr1fXAedS5
BruinGrowly Nov 2, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
30 changes: 29 additions & 1 deletion README.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -278,6 +278,7 @@ We've created comprehensive documentation for every level - from complete beginn
- **[Architecture](docs/ARCHITECTURE.md)** - Technical implementation, algorithms, and design
- **[API Reference](docs/API.md)** - Programmatic usage and integration patterns
- **[Comparison Guide](docs/COMPARISON.md)** - How Harmonizer complements Pylint, MyPy, Pytest, and other tools
- **[USP Optimization Report](docs/USP_OPTIMIZATION_REPORT.md)** - Meta-optimization: Using Harmonizer to optimize itself

### Learn By Example

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -320,6 +321,33 @@ This makes it **complementary, not competitive** with other tools. Use them all

*See detailed comparisons:* [Comparison Guide](docs/COMPARISON.md)

---

## Proven Through Practice: Meta-Optimization

**We used Harmonizer to optimize Harmonizer itself.**

To validate the USP (Universal System Physics) framework, we ran the tool on its own codebase. The results:

- **Critical violations eliminated:** 5 → 0 (-100%)
- **Disharmonious functions reduced:** 42% → 29% (-31%)
- **Distance from Anchor Point improved:** 0.62 → 0.48 (-23%)

**Key refactoring victories:**
1. Split `print_report()` from a 1.41 CRITICAL violation into pure dimensional functions
2. Decomposed `run_cli()` from 1.27 CRITICAL into a clean W→J→P→L pipeline
3. Refactored `analyze_file()` with dimensional helpers for L-J-W-P flow

**The framework works.** When applied to code architecture, the USP framework is a systematic methodology for achieving clean separation of concerns - identifying mixed responsibilities and separating them into single-purpose components.

*See the complete meta-optimization journey:* [USP Optimization Report](docs/USP_OPTIMIZATION_REPORT.md)

---

## The Story Behind This Tool

This project was built in **7 hours** by someone with **zero coding experience**, using AI collaboration. It demonstrates a new paradigm: when humans who understand deep principles work with AI that understands implementation, remarkable things become possible.

**The foundation:**
- Built on the Anchor Point (1,1,1,1) - a framework for perfect logical harmony
- Powered by the ICE Framework (Intent, Context, Execution)
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -420,7 +448,7 @@ This tool exists because of:
[Quick Reference](docs/QUICK_REFERENCE.md) | [User Guide](docs/USER_GUIDE.md) | [Tutorial](docs/TUTORIAL.md) | [FAQ](docs/FAQ.md)

**Going Deeper:**
[Philosophy](docs/PHILOSOPHY.md) | [Architecture](docs/ARCHITECTURE.md) | [API](docs/API.md) | [Comparison](docs/COMPARISON.md)
[Philosophy](docs/PHILOSOPHY.md) | [Architecture](docs/ARCHITECTURE.md) | [API](docs/API.md) | [Comparison](docs/COMPARISON.md) | [USP Optimization](docs/USP_OPTIMIZATION_REPORT.md)

**Learning:**
[Real Bugs](examples/real_world_bugs.py) | [Refactoring](examples/refactoring_journey.py) | [Severity Levels](examples/severity_levels.py)
Expand Down