Proposal to add auditor certification types#467
Merged
JieXiong9119 merged 2 commits intoBuildingSync:develop-v2from May 4, 2023
Merged
Conversation
markborkum
added
Schema: General
JieXiong9119
approved these changes
Apr 19, 2023
Contributor
JieXiong9119
left a comment
JieXiong9119
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks great! Thank you Mark.
…es-for-brisbane-ca
This was referenced Sep 20, 2023
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Any background context you want to provide?
Qualifications/designations requested by city of Brisbane, CA, during development of new audit report template in the Audit Template tool.
What does this PR do?
Adds new enumerations to the
auc:AuditorCertificationTypeelement.How should this be manually tested?
N/A
What are the relevant tickets?
N/A
Screenshots (if appropriate)
N/A