Skip to content

Conversation

@tdgroot
Copy link
Member

@tdgroot tdgroot commented Feb 2, 2023

The section about Varnish was wrong, because you'd get both a server.storecode and varnish.storecode, while you'd only want to have the latter when working with a Varnish configuration. Otherwise, Varnish would be bypassed for these storecode URLS by the existence of server.storecode.

The section about Varnish was wrong, because you'd get both a `server.storecode` and `varnish.storecode`, while you'd only want to have the latter when working with a Varnish configuration. Otherwise, Varnish would be bypassed for these storecode URLS by the existence of `server.storecode`.
@tdgroot tdgroot temporarily deployed to acceptance February 2, 2023 11:53 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 2, 2023

Acceptance server is available at https://hntestgroot-ephprsj02.hypernode.io

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 2, 2023

Acceptance server is available at https://hntestgroot-ephprsj02.hypernode.io

@tdgroot tdgroot merged commit 77dde68 into master Feb 2, 2023
@tdgroot tdgroot deleted the tdgroot-patch-2 branch February 2, 2023 15:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants