Update udunits to 2.2.x branch

[durack1]

We are a minor release behind the udunits latest (2.1.24 vs 2.2.17). I also note that they've migrated across to a git repo: https://github.com/Unidata/UDUNITS-2, switching to this would avoid having to manage the source tar balls

@doutriaux1 @aashish24 want to assign this task as a 2.1 milestone?

[doutriaux1]

please test before submiting, I vaguely remmber switching to the newer one and not pushing this thorugh, there's probably a good reason....

[aashish24]

assigned to @durack1

[durack1]

@doutriaux1 ok source was already updated at the ${LLNL_URL} - you just hadn't tested 2.2.17?

[durack1]

@doutriaux1 @aashish24 can you mark this as a 2.2 milestone please?

[alliepiper]

@jbeezley @durack1 @aashish24 @doutriaux1

Removing the patch step breaks compilation on travis builds. Ref #769.

The patch just drops in a new configure script that removes the checks for flex (as detection is broken on the travis builds and udunits doesn't actually use any lexers, anyway).

Looks like a new patched configure file is needed for the new version.

[aashish24]

@dlonie can push a brach with the fix?

[aashish24]

Actually the new udunits should have CMake. May be we should use it instead?

[alliepiper]

Sure, I'll look into it.

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Aashish Chaudhary <notifications@github.com

wrote:

Actually the new udunits should have CMake. May be we should use it
instead?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#847 (comment).

[durack1]

@doutriaux1 wanna add the enhancement label (for @chaosphere2112's readme: #913)

[doutriaux1]

done and you now have permissions to add labels on the repo, so feel free to do it.

[durack1]

@doutriaux1 currently doing that now.. thanks..