fix and testcase for empty deviation parameter#140
Merged
michalvasko merged 1 commit intoCESNET:develfrom Mar 14, 2019
Merged
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## devel #140 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 37.86% 38.07% +0.21%
==========================================
Files 23 23
Lines 9922 9927 +5
Branches 1947 1947
==========================================
+ Hits 3757 3780 +23
+ Misses 5233 5202 -31
- Partials 932 945 +13
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Member
|
Hi, Regards, |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In our tests, the <capability> element in <hello> message sporadically contained an empty deviations parameter ("&deviations="). The issue could be reproduced by a test case (test_server_thread.c).
We see the root cause in the missing initialization of v in in nc_server_get_cpblts_version().
Please have a look,
Frank