Skip to content

Conversation

@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

This change introduces a memory pool for the mla_link_list data structure to optimize performance and reduce memory usage. By replacing frequent calls to mla_malloc and mla_free with a custom allocator, we minimize system call overhead and improve memory locality. Additionally, the node and list structures have been simplified by removing a now-redundant buffer ownership system, further reducing the memory footprint of each node.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 9665817154652048469

Replaced direct mla_malloc/mla_free calls with a custom memory pool for mla_link_list_node_t. This significantly improves performance by reducing system calls for node allocation and deallocation.

It also reduces memory overhead by removing the now-redundant mla_buffer_reference_t members (nextOwner, prevOwner) from the node structure, simplifying the implementation. The new implementation maintains the linked-list interface while providing substantial efficiency gains.
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor Author

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant