Fix Deserialization error when "extensions" contains "extra" field #10
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
Author
|
The llinked issue is: #7 Unfortunately i can't link this pull request myself. |
Contributor
Author
|
Could you please merge this if the solution is still okay? |
Contributor
Author
|
Hi Josh, could you please build a new release so the error doesn't occur anymore ? Thank you! |
Contributor
|
@nitram22 done |
Contributor
Author
|
Thank you ! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi,
I tried to fix the issue that the library isn't able to parse an entry that contains the field "extra" in the "extensions" section.
@joshbooks has tried to fix the bug before, so I used his solution as a starting point. Now the code doesn't create an infinite loop anymore and still parses the extensions correctly.
Maybe you guys could look into it and see if it works for you.
Unfortunately I had to replace the NotImplementedException with an UnsupportedOperationException, because I work with OpenJDK and have no access to the reflectiveObjects packages.